patching...
Update: We've just hit 880 Facebook likes! Click here to help us get to 900! »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Which Film Should Win Best Picture at The Oscars?

Handicapping the awards is a favorite of movie buffs; this year, there is a Milwaukee-area interest in one of the nominees.

 

A Wauwatosa native produced one of the nine films nominated for Best Picture at the 85th Academy Awards, which are Sunday at 7:30 p.m. on WISN (Channel 12).

After winning awards at the Sundance and Cannes film festivals, Michael Raisler's "Beasts of the Southern Wild" is in cinema’s most elite fraternity, along with:

Which one will win? Which one should win? Tell us about your favorite — or one you think may have been snubbed — by voting in our poll and commenting below.

  • Which film will win Best Picture at The Oscars?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Beasts of the Southern Wild
        1 (5%)
    • Zero Dark Thirty
        1 (5%)
    • Silver Linings Playbook
        2 (11%)
    • Lincoln
        4 (22%)
    • Les Miserables
        5 (27%)
    • Life of Pi
        1 (5%)
    • Amour
        0 (0%)
    • Django Unchained
        1 (5%)
    • Argo
        3 (16%)
    Total votes: 18
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: 85th Academy Awards and The Oscars

Comment_arrow

Born Free

8:46 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

@Steve: I concour but I have to say it would be close if The Greater Glory (staring Andy Garcia and Peter O'Toole) were on the choice list, too.

Richard

6:49 am on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Sorry, I could care less, won't watch the very liberal elite and highly paid self indulging film people. I will find something productive to do. This is another diversion from the real importance of waht people should be paying attention to, like this country going broke. Paying homage to a bunch of left wingers is not my desire. wonder what political statements will be made by them perhaps about gun control versus their violent film making, video games and drug latent complicity.

Reply

Richard

12:01 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Besides the film makers and actors represented by the oscars are the true 1% except they aren't demogouged due to the fact that the majority support the current administration and liberal democrats in particular.

Reply

David Tatarowicz

12:02 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

@Richard Interesting take on films, and not one that I disagree with entirely. I do enjoy watching some films, actually many films, but the film industry seems to be very ego centric and I think the quality has gone down somewhat --- they are substituting special effects and hour long gun battles for story telling, introspection, and enlightenment.

However -- I think the Sports Industry is a much bigger diversion of people's time and is even less useful than the film industry. We have people glued to their tv sets to watch a blood sport every Sunday, while they don't spend any time reading the newspaper for more in depth analysis (albeit often biased) -- and they know who is an up and coming college player who they think should be drafted, but don't know the names of their legislators, or the nuances of the debates on domestic and international issues.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Richard

8:06 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Agree with you on the sports aspect too, pro team athletes are grossly overpaid and so many use steroids or worse in place of skill. They represent another diversion from what is really important in our country and world today. More people know the sports scores or when dancing with the stars is on than who the VP of the country is or the history of the world covering the period 1930-2000.

SkinnyDude

1:26 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Havent seen any of them . But usually the one that wins best picture is one I would never watch . These current awards have no correlation with entertainment . There is certainly talent in a lot of the films here , but there is also no shortage of boredom.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Heather Asiyanbi

7:21 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

@skinny - I forget what I was watching, but someone on some news program (like how I get the details so correct?) said the Academy Awards used to honor films that most people had not just seen but really loved. These were movies that packed theaters, not just attracted critics' raves while the rest of us scratched our heads trying to remember if we'd ever even heard the title.

Comment_arrow

SkinnyDude

7:32 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

@ Heather ....Much like the music biz the film biz is pretty diluted now. I think a lot of it is propaganda as even the so called voters havent seen all the films . It would likelly be a more intelligent program if the voters had to see all the movies nominated . That is not the case. Some of them I am sure id like , but I 100% not watching the boring program after the beginning monologe. Enjoy! :)

DK

1:41 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Totally agree with Richard! I could care less about the egocentric members of the film industry. There are more important things in life than what the actresses wear (all the stuff is borrowed anyway) and whose turn it is to win an Oscar. Few other fields lavish that much attention on themselves and expect the public to be interested.

Reply

Dr. Jodie

2:12 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Life of Pi will leave you speechless.

Reply

Steve ®

2:30 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Stop giving money to these hypocrites

Reply

Anne Elliot

3:03 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

I have to laugh at all the ignorant people who "could care less" about films, or so many other things. Your inability to use the English language casts doubt on all your other opinions. Think about it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Randy1949

3:26 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Oh yes, my English teacher told us about that one back in 1965. The best that can be said is that this is a commonly understood idiom for not giving a hoot.

It works if you insert a few strategic clauses: 'I COULD, theoretically, care less. But it would be difficult.'

SkinnyDude

3:42 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

The only thing more boring than a lot of these films is to here this hollywood crowd thanking everyone for how great they perceive each other . Seriously, the show is too long and boring .Watch the opening monologue and than turn it off and read a small recap about it on Monday.

Reply

gardengirl

5:13 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

There are so many negative comments about filmmakers here. If these people were as knowledgeable as they were negative they would be paying attention to the awards and hoping that Beasts of the Southern Wild wins. The movie was made with a small percentage of the funds available to the other movies. It was paid for by a small firm that finances socially significant movies and the actors were all unpaid and had no previous acting experience. Yet somehow ths tiny film has four nominations. It would be nice to see it win over the usual favorites.

Reply

Dr. Jodie

5:38 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Excellent comment! I have not seen "Beasts" yet, but would love to. I think anyone who has not seen a movie, often cannot comment in a useful way. Unless you read the book, you would have no clue what Life of Pi is truly about. The emotional impact is life changing. I admire those in an industry that can have such an impact on those they reach.

Reply

Bob McBride

9:27 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

I tried watching it. About 3 minutes into Seth MacFarlane's monologue I'd had enough and switched channels to something a bit more highbrow (or at least less annoying to fall asleep to) - a "Duck Dynasty" marathon.

It's entirely possible to appreciate and enjoy movies w/o sitting through 2-3 hours of the industry patting itself on the back.

Reply

SkinnyDude

9:47 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

YIKES......Just watched the opening of Oscars as that is suppose to be loaded with humor. Seth MacFarlane completely bombed and Capt Kirk seemed horribly misplaced other than when he predicted Seth would suck . I Beamed out of this disaster at warp speed

Reply

Steve ®

1:40 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

Was Laura Bush ever a presenter on the Oscars?

Reply

Richard

6:55 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

Argos, a tribute to President Carter, not a true portrayal of what really took place, Michelle the presenter, obviously a democratic propaganda piece. Meanwhile the film on the pursuit of Osama Bin Laden was totally dissed. I did not watch the elites patting themselves on the back, boring and high on self interest doesn't appeal to my psyche.

Reply

Leave a comment