What Does Act 10 Decision Mean to Greenfield?

Greenfield Mayor Michael Neitzke said if the court's most recent decision stands the impact could be dramatic.

As the state of Wisconsin of Dane County Circuit Judge Juan Colas declaring the state’s , municipal and school district leaders are left pondering, "What's next?"

Colas's ruling came out of the blue and at a time when municipalities and school districts are in the middle of budget planning for the next fiscal year, or putting the finishing touches on budgets.

Greenfield Mayor Michael Neitzke said preparing budgets and maintaining services has become increasingly difficult over the last couple of years. He said that has again been the case while preparing the city's 2013 budget, which he hopes to present to the Common Council and get approved in the next few weeks.

But if the court's most recent decision stands, Neitzke said the impact could be dramatic.

"The cost efficiencies of Act 10 have been incorporated not only in our budget, but more directly in the way that we do things," he said. "Changing it back will not be easy, nor will it not be painful.

Neitzke broke the scenario down like this: you have a $150 worth of things to do, but only have $100 to spend. You create a $100 budget that’ll work by trimming and cutting where needed. Then someone comes along and says you have to spend an additional $20, on top of the $100 you just budgeted for.

"Something has to give," Neitzke said.  

"While it won’t be easy, I have to think it will be even more difficult for the school districts. What do you do when you have entered into a health insurance contract with a lower cost provider, and a court essentially tells you that you have to go back to the more expensive old one? It has to have an impact on the kids."

Patch has not yet spoken with representatives from the Greenfield or Whitnall school districts.

Neitzke said planning budgets has been difficult lately.

"It’s easy to forget that those budgets actually pay for things: police officers, paramedics, snow plowing, roads, elections, restaurant safety, parks, and a bunch more things," Neitzke said. "It’s easy to prepare a budget that’s balanced. It’s more difficult to prepare a budget that is balanced and actually pays for all of the things that citizens rightly expect.

"We’ll all have to see where this decision goes.  I think it is fair to say that this isn’t the end of it."

Str8shooter September 16, 2012 at 10:19 PM
Does it really mean anything? Chances are this decision is only temporary but let's say this liberal decision is agreed upon during the appeal and public employees have their bargaining rights back. Although police and fire can still negotiate their contracts except for healthcare, the police and fire are paying into pension, greatly increased healthcare rates, and little to no raise. So even with that union still existing police and fire took cuts. Hypothetically if the rest of the public employees once again have unions, the city officials have to agree to a contract. The unions just don't tell the city what the contract will be. And if the two sides disagree on a contract, an impartial arbitrator is brought in who looks at the city's finances and chooses a fair contract based on that. Perfect evidence of that is the police department(I believe down south) that began paying their police officers minimum wage and actually broke the contract due to being bankrupt. So if Greenfield can prove we are bankrupt then there is nothing to worry about.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »