Greenfield Looking at Creative School-Start Time Solutions

Some members of the Greenfield School Board want to change the high school start times, a year and a half after the administration's latest proposal was shot down

In an effort to address the Greenfield School District's on-again, off-again hot topic of school start times without experiencing a significant fiscal impact, district administrators are looking outside the box.

Mostly because their inside-the-box ideas have not gained the majority of the School Board’s approval.

Nearly a year and a half after the Greenfield School Board voted down a proposal to change Greenfield High School's start times from 7:10 a.m. to 7:45 a.m. or later because of concerns of additional busing costs, administrators offered a few new ideas Monday.

The ideas, all in the early stages of development, revolve around the school’s tardiness problem.

In 2007-08, when the GHS start time changed from 7:15 a.m. to 7:10 a.m., the tardy-to-school rate doubled from the previous year, according to data provided to the board by administration. Unexcused tardies to school went from 4,086 in 2006-07 to 7,956 in 08-08. They have remained above 7,000 every year since.

An idea administration floated out to the board Monday was for chronically tardy students to start school at the second hour of the day. Those students could conceivably have no study hall, so they wouldn’t have any less opportunities to acquire credits necessary to graduate, or have a first-hour study hall that would make their arrival time flexible.

Another possibility would be to add another academic period at the end of the school day.

Board member Cathy Walsh said she liked flexible scheduling for all students and regretted the board’s action to change the start time in the first place.

“We should have never let a bus company determine our high school schedule,” she said. “That was a big, big, big mistake. We should be making a schedule and start time based on what’s best for our students academically.

“What’s good about a 7:10 start time? Nothing is good about it, yet we’re defending it as if it’s the best thing that ever happened to our schools. Look where we are academically.”

In May 2011, after an ad hoc committee studied the impact of the early start times, administration proposed a new start time that would have cost the district $210,000 in new busing costs. The board rejected the proposal.

Walsh, who was not on the board at the time, said money should not be the sole deciding factor.

“I want to remind the board that we had a pretty healthy amount of money in our budget (fund balance) last year and the year before that and the year before that,” Walsh said. “We haven’t been spending all of our budget each year. Although I’m not in favor of spending $200,000 on busing, we owe it to the community to do something.”

Board member Rick Moze said making the schedule a flexible one for those with tardiness issues only rewards those who aren’t getting to school on time and would make the problem worse. Dolores Skowronek, a Greenfield parent and member of the executive board of a national coalition called Start School Later, said changes should be made for all students, not just those who are chronically tardy.

“The evidence is overwhelming,” Skowronek said. “Early high school start times, such as ours, do not enhance academic achievement, do not promote wellness and do not prepare students for success. … Our students deserve better.”

Superintendent Conrad Farner said potential impacts of the suggestions presented to the board Monday had not yet been ironed out.

He said tardiness is a problem administration is looking into, and added over the last few years, the administrative team has spent hundreds of hours looking into scheduling changes the board eventually shot down.

“How much more time do you want us to put into it?” Farner said.

School board president Bruce Bailey, who voted against the change in May 2011, said a start time of 7:30 a.m. would be better than the current start time — “Then people couldn’t say we have the earliest start time in the world,” he said — but admitted he’s not sure what else the board can learn that hasn't already been discussed.

The board agreed to revisit the issue at its meeting next month.

Stephanie Macklin December 27, 2012 at 09:16 PM
There should be no loss of sleep time for the kids because they should have parents that enforce going to bed at a resonable time. Issue solved!!!
KHD December 27, 2012 at 10:01 PM
Karen, You are Irrelevant. It wasnt just the printing company, but all other management jobs as well. Some kids will not go on to college and into the work place. You are part of the problem. Thats ok hunny, mommy will take care of it for you . You just stay up late and I will get the time changed for you. Besides, I think the money would be spent more wisely adding more security measures to our schools. Put this start time thing on hold. I think everyone would agree that is alot more important. Security of our schools should be looked at immediately. There are alot of Ideas out there, lets get this rolling now.
CowDung January 18, 2013 at 08:36 PM
Changing the start times will just push everything later--including bed times. http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/teens-health/CC00019/NSECTIONGROUP=2 From the Mayo Clinic: "Resetting the clock The good news is that your teen doesn't have to be at the mercy of his or her internal clock. To help your teen develop better sleep habits: --Adjust the lighting. As bedtime approaches, dim the lights. Then turn off the lights during sleep. In the morning, expose your teen to bright light. These simple cues can help signal when it's time to sleep and when it's time to wake up. --Stick to a schedule. Tough as it may be, encourage your teen to go to bed and get up at the same time every day — even on weekends. Prioritize extracurricular activities and curb late-night social time as needed. If your teen has a job, limit working hours to no more than 16 to 20 hours a week. --Nix long naps. If your teen is drowsy during the day, a 30-minute nap after school might be refreshing. Be cautious, though. Too much daytime shut-eye might only make it harder to fall asleep at night. --Curb the caffeine. A jolt of caffeine might help your teen stay awake during class, but the effects are fleeting — and too much caffeine can interfere with a good night's sleep."
CowDung January 18, 2013 at 08:36 PM
Continued: "--Keep it calm. Encourage your teen to wind down at night with a warm shower, a book or other relaxing activities. Discourage stimulating activities — including vigorous exercise, loud music, video games, television, computer use and text messaging — an hour or two before bedtime. --Know when to unplug. Take the TV out of your teen's room, or keep it off at night. The same goes for your teen's cellphone, computer and other electronic gadgets."
Maribel Ibrahim February 08, 2013 at 12:33 PM
Last nite, I got 9 hrs sleep. In bed @ 9:30pm (biologically impossible for most teens) & woke @ 6:30am (missed the bus) #sleepcrunch


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »